Faculty Access

1. Cover page

Identifies the portfolio. These values are reused in the document header and in the review and approval page.

Institution

Course

Instructor

2. Curriculum vitae

Accreditation faculty record. Leave a table empty and it is omitted from the exported document.

2.1 Education

2.2 Academic experience

A. Teaching

B. Training and courses

C. Supervision

2.3 Non-academic experience

2.4 Certifications and professional registration

2.5 Membership of professional organisations

2.6 Honours and awards

2.7 Principal publications of the past five years

2.8 Presentations

2.9 Service activities

2.10 Reviewing and editorial activities

2.11 Professional development

3. Course syllabus

The twelve syllabus items required by the accreditation format, ending with the course learning outcome to graduate outcome map.

3.1 Course identification

3.2 Catalogue description

3.3 Prerequisites and co-requisites

3.4 Textbooks and materials

3.5 Course objectives

3.6 Topics

3.7 Weekly schedule (theory)

3.8 Weekly schedule (laboratory)

3.9 Computer and software use

3.10 Evaluation methods

The weight column is summed automatically. The total must reach 100 percent before the portfolio is submitted.

3.11 Contribution to the professional component

3.12 Course learning outcomes and graduate outcome map

3.13 Additional information

4. Assessment plan and outcome mapping

Every assessment of the semester, then the graduate outcomes selected for programme level attainment evidence in this portfolio.

4.1 Plan of semester assessments

4.2 Graduate outcomes assessed in this portfolio

Outcomes entered here populate the target outcome list of every assessment record in section 6 and the summary table in section 7.

5. Assessment methodology

Terminology, rating scale and attainment calculation applied to every rubric assessed instrument in section 6.

5.1 Terminology

5.2 Performance level indicator scale

5.3 Attainment calculation

Average = (1·n₁ + 2·n₂ + 3·n₃ + 4·n₄) / N   ·   Attainment (%) = (Average / 4) × 100

n_k is the number of students placed at level k and N is the number of students assessed. Both figures are computed for you in section 6 as you enter the counts.

6. Assessment records

One record per assessed instrument. The performance indicators you define drive the two rubrics, the rating tables and the comparison table, so you enter each indicator only once.

7. Evaluation and improvement summary

Compiled from the assessment records. The results, the target and the decision are computed; the improvement action is yours to write.

8. Review and approval

Signature block for the instructor, the peer reviewer and the quality assurance committee.

Appendix: evidence held with the portfolio